<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the Difference Between Loaded and No Load Funds?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenpandatreehouse.com/2008/01/02/whats-the-difference-between-loaded-and-no-load-funds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenpandatreehouse.com/2008/01/02/whats-the-difference-between-loaded-and-no-load-funds/</link>
	<description>Working Student’s View of Personal Finance and Frugal Living</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Green Panda</title>
		<link>http://www.greenpandatreehouse.com/2008/01/02/whats-the-difference-between-loaded-and-no-load-funds/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Panda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenpandatreehouse.com/2008/01/02/whats-the-difference-between-loaded-and-no-load-funds/#comment-771</guid>
		<description>I'm still learning so thanks for sharing that information!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still learning so thanks for sharing that information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall</title>
		<link>http://www.greenpandatreehouse.com/2008/01/02/whats-the-difference-between-loaded-and-no-load-funds/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenpandatreehouse.com/2008/01/02/whats-the-difference-between-loaded-and-no-load-funds/#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Pushed is the right word. I've seen some funds that I seriously considered the load worth it, because of the historic returns, but it's still a near thing. 

Ing Russia for instance has 5%, but their rate of return historically has been nearly 40%/year. 

Still,.. I'll probably stick with no/low load. 

One thing I did find out, for MANY of the loaded funds, there IS a no-load equiv. in most of the larger fund companies (Fidelity, Vangard, etc). Sometimes you just have to look for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushed is the right word. I&#8217;ve seen some funds that I seriously considered the load worth it, because of the historic returns, but it&#8217;s still a near thing. </p>
<p>Ing Russia for instance has 5%, but their rate of return historically has been nearly 40%/year. </p>
<p>Still,.. I&#8217;ll probably stick with no/low load. </p>
<p>One thing I did find out, for MANY of the loaded funds, there IS a no-load equiv. in most of the larger fund companies (Fidelity, Vangard, etc). Sometimes you just have to look for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
